redyelmv.gif (12119 bytes)  Home Laws Advice Fitness SiteMap Links GuestBook Discuss Search corshamref.net   

 

Serious Injury: Law 5 Referees' Powers and Duties.

The aim of this page is to provide a standard process for dealing with injuries in the field of play.

The S.ER.I.O.U.S. (a standard process for dealing with injuries in the field of play.)

Serious? (The first consideration is to decide if an injury is serious or not.)
Evaluate? (Evaluate each injury situation as it arises. Does play need to be stopped?)
Race. (Sprinting to the scene of the injury).
Inspect. (Taking up a position that allows inspection of the injury and monitoring the remaining players).
Organise. (Taking charge, positioning and seeking medical assistance if it is required). 
Usher. (Overseeing the safe removal of injured players). 
Start. (Starting the game again after the injury has been seen to).

Dopey's Power Referee Cartoon by Julian Carosi

Questions and Answers

S.E.R.I.O.U.S. method for dealing with Injuries.

(Advice for Soccer/Football Referees by Julian Carosi FA Licenced Referees' Instructor England www.CorshamRef.net)

INTRODUCTION: 

The Powers and Duties of the Referee listed in Law 5, state that the Referee is responsible, and has a duty to stop the match if, in his opinion, a player is seriously injured and ensures that he is removed from the field of play. An injured player may only return to the field of play after the match has restarted. 

The Referee can also allow play to continue until the ball is out of play if a player is, in his opinion, only slightly injured. It is his duty to ensure that any player bleeding from a wound leaves the field of play. The player may only return on receiving a signal from the Referee, who must be satisfied that the bleeding has stopped.

One development area surprisingly deficient in many football/soccer Referees' capabilities, is a standard process for dealing with injury situations on the field of play. Invariably, the Referee (in good faith) deals with each situation with the health and safety of the injured player paramount. But very often, there is little (or no) thought given, to proactively preventing eager trainers from rushing onto the field of play. Sensible positioning by the Referee (whilst inspecting the injury) is also sometimes missing. The Referee has a duty to monitor all of the players, and not just the one who is injured. Another worrying aspect is the amount of times that the Referee wanders away from the injury location, to have friendly conversation with the other players whilst the injury is being dealt with. Without a set process to consider, it is also not surprising, that on some occasions, the Referee forgets to ask the treated player to leave the field of play, and to await a signal to re-enter at a suitable time after play has been restarted. The advice shown here, encourages Referees to use a set process for managing injuries. Whilst the advice may differ from that used in other countries, it is not meant as a definitive guide, but as a basis for improving the process used when dealing with injury situations. Also included, is a selection of relevant information included in official publications. 

Making contact with the trainers/medical staff before the game starts:
Prior to kick-off, the Referee (and Assistant Referees) should try and make contact with the team trainers (or medical staff) and remind them to await the Referee's signal before entering the field of play when an injury occurs. The Referee should demonstrate the outstretched beckoning arm/palm signal that he will be using to summon the trainers/medical staff onto the field of play to assess an injury. The trainers/medical staff should be reminded that if it is possible to safely remove an injured player, treatment should not be applied on the field of play. But that the players' health and safety must always be paramount.


CONTENTS:

Part A: The S.ER.I.O.U.S. (standard process for dealing with injuries in the field of play.)

Part B: Details contained within the Laws and other official publications concerning the safety of players and how to deal with injuries.


Part A: The S.ER.I.O.U.S. (a standard process for dealing with injuries in the field of play.)

Serious? (The first consideration is to decide if an injury is serious or not.)
Evaluate? (Evaluate each injury situation as it arises. Does play need to be stopped?)
Race. (Sprinting to the scene of the injury).
Inspect. (Taking up a position that allows inspection of the injury and monitoring the remaining players).
Organise. (Taking charge, positioning and seeking medical assistance if it is required). 
Usher. (Overseeing the safe removal of injured players). 
Start. (Starting the game again after the injury has been seen to).


Serious? (The first consideration is to decide if an injury is serious or not.)

Exceptions to this ruling are made only for: 

If the injury is serious:

What is serious injury? 

Some examples of serious injury that can occur to a player in a game of football/soccer are:

Why is a head injury so serious?

A serious head injury may include some of the following symptoms: 

Immediately after a head injury occurs, it can be difficult to tell the difference between a mild concussion and a more serious injury. A brain bruise (contusion) or bleeding within the skull at first may cause only mild symptoms. 

Players who have experienced a head injury should be watched carefully for 24 hours. 

If serious head injury is suspected, an immediate visit to the hospital or to a Doctor is essential. Players who have suffered from concussion should be advised not to play any further part in the game.

What is concussion?

CONCUSSION is an internal head injury. Of all the head injuries, this is the most insidious, and many casualties have succumbed several hours after the incident. 

The Referee should be especially observant when contact involves children - the myth that you can 'run off' concussion by 'playing on', is a dangerous attitude, and has caused grief and embarrassment to many players, parents and coaches when the player eventually collapses. 

Concussion is potentially very serious, and an indifferent attitude is to be discouraged.

What are the signs and symptoms of fractured bones?

Some, or all, of the following:

Are damaged ligaments more serious than a broken bone? 

Bones are connected to each other in joints by ligaments. When excessive force is applied to joint, ligaments may be torn or damaged. This type of injury is a sprain. 

The seriousness of a sprain depends on how badly ligaments are damaged. Sprains can occur in any joint, but they occur most commonly in the ankle, knee, and finger.

Should the Referee allow a dirty sponge or dirty bucket of water to be used?


Evaluate? (Evaluate each injury situation as it arises. Does play need to be stopped?)

The Referee will need to quickly evaluate each injury situation as it arises. Initial evaluation can sometimes be done from a distance, but on other occasions, the Referee will need to evaluate the seriousness of an injury from close quarters. Whether to stop play or not, depends on a number of factors which will need to be taken into consideration. Some of these are listed below:

If the player is only slightly injured.


Race. (Sprinting to the scene of the injury).


Inspect. (Taking up a position that allows inspection of the injury and monitoring the remaining players).

Inspecting and assessing the injury:


Organise. (Taking charge, positioning and seeking medical assistance if it is required).


Usher. (Overseeing the safe removal of injured players). 


Start. (Starting the game again after the injury has been seen to).


Part B: Details contained within the Laws and other official publications concerning the safety of players and how to deal with injuries.

(Sources: Laws of Association Football, Additional Instructions for Assistant Referees and Fourth Official, and FA Advice on the Application of the Laws.)

Law 1 - The Field of Play:

Flagposts - A flagpost, must not be less than 1.5 m (5 ft) high, with a non-pointed top.

Safety - Goals must be anchored securely to the ground. Portable goals may only be used if they satisfy this requirement.

International F.A. Board Decisions: 

Decision 1.


If the crossbar becomes displaced or broken, play is stopped until it has been repaired or replaced in position. If a repair is not possible, the match is abandoned. The use of a rope to replace the crossbar is not permitted.

Decision 2.

Goalposts and crossbars must be made of wood, metal or other approved material. Their shape may be square, rectangular, round or elliptical and they must not be dangerous to players. 

Law 4 - The Players Equipment: 

Safety: A player must not use equipment or wear anything which is dangerous to himself or another player (including any kind of jewellery). 

Law 5 - The Referee: 

Powers and Duties.

Decisions of the International F.A. Board

Decision 1


A Referee (or where applicable, an Assistant Referee or fourth official) is not held liable for:

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct:

Decisions of the International F.A. Board

Cautionable Offences


A direct free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a player is careless, reckless, or uses excessive force if he kicks (or attempts to kick), trips (or attempts to trip), jumps at, charges, strikes, or pushes an opponent. 

Sending-Off Offences:

A player, substitute or substituted player is sent off and shown the red card if he is guilty of violent conduct, serious foul play or spitting.

Decision 4 - A tackle, which endangers the safety of an opponent, must be sanctioned as serious foul play.

Kicks from the Penalty Mark:

A goalkeeper who is injured while kicks are being taken from the penalty mark and is unable to continue as goalkeeper may be replaced by a named substitute provided his team has not used the maximum number of substitutes permitted under the competition rules.

The Technical Area:

The coach and other officials must remain within the confines of the technical area except in special circumstances, for example, a physiotherapist or doctor entering the field of play, with the Referee's permission, to assess an injured player.

Additional Instructions for Referees and Assistant Referees and Fourth Officials:

Serious Foul Play

A player is guilty of serious foul play if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when challenging for the ball when it is in play.

Any player who lunges at an opponent in challenging for the ball from the front, from the side or from behind using one or both legs, with excessive force and endangering the safety of an opponent is guilty of serious foul play.

Violent Conduct

Violent conduct may occur either on the field of play or outside its boundaries, whether the ball is in play or not. A player is guilty of violent conduct if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball.

He is also guilty of violent conduct if he uses excessive force or brutality against a team-mate or any other person.

Scissors or bicycle kick

A scissors kick is permissible provided, in the opinion of the Referee, it is not dangerous to an opponent.

Attitude towards Referees

A player who assaults a Referee or who is guilty of using offensive, insulting or abusive language or gestures must be sent off.

Jewellery

Referees are reminded that, in accordance with Law 4, players may not wear any kind of jewellery, which is dangerous for himself or another player. If it is dangerous must be removed. It cannot be tapped.

All items of jewellery are potentially dangerous. The term "dangerous" can sometimes be ambiguous and controversial; therefore in order to be uniform and consistent any kind of jewellery has to be forbidden.

Players are not allowed to use tape to cover jewellery. Taping jewellery is not adequate protection.

Rings, earrings, leather or rubber bands are not necessary to play and the only thing they can bring about is injury.

In order to avoid "last minute" problems, teams should inform their players in advance.

Please avoid injuries! Necklaces, rings, bracelets, earrings, leather or rubber bands etc. are not allowed.

Dealing with injured players

Referees must follow the instruction below when dealing with injured players:

Exceptions

Exceptions to this ruling are made only for: 

The aim is to support fair play and to have a uniform and consistent interpretation of the Laws of the Game in order to avoid misunderstandings, injuries and controversial situations.

Non-Basic Equipment

Safety
A player must not use equipment or wear anything that is dangerous to himself/herself or another player (including any kind of jewellery).

Liquid Refreshments
Players are entitled to take liquid refreshments during a stoppage in the match but only on the touchline. It is not permitted to throw plastic water bags or any water containers onto the field.

Advice on the Application of the Laws of the Game (FA Learning booklet advice): 

Goalpost Safety

It is the responsibility of the match Referee to point out to the participating clubs or pitch users before a game that any metal cup hooks on either the goalposts or crossbar could constitute a danger. This could constitute finger entrapment due to the wearing of a ring or create severe neck injuries due to other jewellery being worn such as earrings or necklaces. Whilst the Laws of the Game clearly state that jewellery should not be worn during any part of a match, such dangers could also exist prior to, or immediately after matches, where nets need to be fitted or removed by any user or club personnel.

If both teams are prepared to play, having had this fact pointed out to them, then it is The FA's view that the Referee can be considered to have done as much as might be reasonable in the circumstances to the relevant League and County FA.

LAW 4 - The Player's Equipment

Safety

Referees should ensure that players do not wear articles which may constitute a danger to other players or to themselves. Referees should set a good example by removing or taping their own rings and jewellery. Referees, however, should make allowances for religious symbols (e.g. a player of the Sikh religion wearing a Kara in a match), provided that they are not dangerous and that adequate covering be applied as protection.

Footwear
Competition Rules may require Referees to examine footwear and/or players' equipment. Referees may do so additionally either during a match or at half-time if they have any reason to doubt their safety.

LAW 5 - The Referee

Injury to players or the Referee

A player who has left the field of play for treatment for an injury when he is bleeding from a wound may only return to the field of play after inspection by the Referee, neutral Assistant Referee or the 4th Official, which, through necessity, will normally be during a stoppage of the play and at the touchline. The player is only allowed to return to the field of play on receiving a signal from the Referee.

Care needs to be exercised before a seriously injured player is removed from the field of play and Referees must continue to be vigilant and err on the side of safety, accepting the advice of those who are medically qualified or claim to have similar skills. There is a particular need for a rapid assessment and action in cases of head injuries. However, in local football, when there are no medically qualified personnel in attendance, professional assistance should be quickly obtained and the advice offered acted upon. Referees are reminded to add the full amount of time lost to the end of each period of play.

Particular attention is drawn to Decision 1 of the International FA Board in relation to the liability of Referees, Assistant Referees and fourth officials.

If a Referee becomes incapacitated and an Assistant Referee replaces him, the "new" Referee has the authority to reverse a decision made by his colleague, provided the game has not been restarted.

A club trainer or physiotherapist who has been guilty of misconduct should still be granted permission to enter the field of play to treat an injured player. However, a player sent from the field of play, by a Referee, for misconduct, cannot return to the field in any official capacity. Suitable reports must be sent to the appropriate authority.

Players felt to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs

Referees should always exercise extreme care in their choice of words to describe players who may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs, especially in connection with drug influence. In such circumstances, the matter should be considered as a team responsibility and suitable attention be drawn to a club official, perhaps suggesting that a player was too ill to continue/participate or seemed to have a problem.

Restarting by a dropped ball

Occasions do occur in a game when a player having fallen to the ground, has the ball locked between his feet and legs. To dispossess him of the ball may not only be difficult, but fraught with danger of injury. The Referee may, therefore, feel justified in halting play and restarting by dropping the ball appropriately, in accordance with the relevant Law. Similarly, there will be occasions when the goalkeeper, in taking possession of the ball, is injured and no offence has occurred. In this situation, the welfare and safety of the goalkeeper is paramount and the game should be stopped immediately. Once the goalkeeper, or his replacement, is ready to take part in the game, the ball must be dropped by the Referee in accordance with Law. In keeping with the spirit of the game, Referees should ensure that no unfair advantage accrues in favour of either team. Referees are reminded that it is not essential to have a player from either side present at the dropping of the ball.

As a means of restarting the game after a temporary suspension, Referees should not bounce the ball or throw it in the air. The ball should simply be released from no higher than waist level and allowed to fall to the ground.

Playing dangerously

Football is a game where body contact occurs and the Laws are framed so that the players can play without danger to themselves, if their opponents respect both the letter and spirit of the Laws. Each incident must be judged by the Referee as it happens and the question of danger rests entirely on his opinion.

(a) The "Scissors" kick:

This is a clear example of the importance of judging an action according to the situation in which it is performed. A player who kicks or attempts to kick the ball in this way, with no other player near him, cannot be penalised for dangerous play. The same action with a player nearby could be dangerous and would be punished by the award of an indirect free kick. If contact is made, then a direct free kick must be awarded against the offending player.

(b) Playing dangerously close to goalkeepers:

Kicking or attempting to kick the ball whilst it is in the goalkeeper's possession is universally considered to be dangerous; raising the foot to block the ball as he kicks it from his hands is equally dangerous. Attempts to kick the ball powerfully as it is about to come into the goalkeeper's possession are also a common source of danger to goalkeepers. Depending on the degree or intensity of the offender's action, the Referee may have to caution or send off the player committing such an offence.

(c) Goalkeepers:

Goalkeepers, when advancing to catch the ball, sometimes raise one leg in an outward direction to keep opposing players at a distance. If an opponent is in close proximity to the goalkeeper, the Referee may well consider such action constitutes careless or even reckless play, but if the opponent is further away then it would be deemed dangerous play and be punished accordingly.

(10) Tackling

Fair tackling (e.g. making direct contact with the ball) is permitted as it is a skill similar to passing the ball, shooting for goal, etc. However, if a player makes contact with an opponent before touching the ball, then he must be punished by the award of a direct free kick. Depending on the degree and intensity of the challenge, a player may receive an additional punishment in the form of a caution or a sending off.

(a) Tackling with the foot lifted from the ground:

This may be dangerous, but is not necessarily so. Using the sole of the foot is an effective method of controlling the ball, but a player who lifts his foot should be penalised if the Referee considers he is endangering an opponent by doing so. If the player deliberately plays over the ball and makes contact with his opponent's leg, this is a serious foul.

(b) Tackling with two feet together:

The ball acts as a natural "cushion" between the players. If the two-footed tackle is controlled and made from a short distance away, there is no danger to the opponent. If it is an uncontrolled jump at the ball from a distance, the tackle certainly entails a large element of danger to the opponent.

(c) Tackling by sliding:

This tackle is carried out with one or both legs outstretched, and the same considerations as for the two-footed tackle apply. The player tackling in this way, whether or not he may bring his opponent down, should be penalised if he connects with the opponent before the ball.

(d) Tackling which endangers the safety of an opponent

A tackle which is violent with little or no attempt to play the ball and which endangers the safety of an opponent is prohibited and must be sanctioned as serious foul play.

Referees should watch for players who tackle the ball with one foot but trip the opponent with the other foot. In these circumstances, a penal offence has been committed. 

(13) Serious foul play and violent conduct

Football is a bodily contact sport. However, the contest to gain possession of the 14
ball should nonetheless be fair. Where play is vigorous, but fair, the Referee must recognise this and allow play to proceed.

Serious foul play and violent conduct are, however, strictly forbidden and the Referee must react to them by stringently applying the Laws of the Game.

Players who, in the Referee's opinion, are guilty of serious foul play or violent conduct shall be sent off the field of play, even if they have not already been cautioned.

The difference between serious foul play and violent conduct can be defined as follows:

(a) Serious foul play can only occur when the ball is in play and when a player unfairly challenges for the ball against an opponent using excessive force.

(b) Violent conduct occurs when a player is guilty of aggression towards an opponent even if he is not challenging for the ball. The ball can be in or out of play. If the ball is in play he shall be sanctioned with a direct free kick in favour of the team of the player who was attacked, from the place where the offence was committed, or with a penalty kick if it took place within the penalty area. If the ball is out of play, the game shall be resumed at the stage where it was interrupted prior to the offence (throw-in, free kick, etc.).

Moreover, if a player, substitute player or substituted player attacks one of his team-mates, the Referee, an Assistant Referee, a spectator, etc., this shall also be considered violent conduct. As mentioned above, this offence can arise when the ball is in or out of play. If the ball is in play, the player shall be penalised by the award of an indirect free kick against his team from the spot where the violent conduct occurred or with a dropped ball taken at the place where the ball was situated at the time of the offence, if this occurred beyond the boundaries of the field of play. If the ball is out of play the game shall be resumed at the stage where it was interrupted prior to the offence (throw-in, free kick, etc.).

Any player, substitute player or substituted player, whether he is within or outside the field of play, whose conduct is unsporting or violent, whether or not it is directed toward an opponent, the Referee, an Assistant Referee, colleague or other person, or who uses offensive or insulting or abusive language and/or gestures is guilty of an offence and shall be dealt with according to the nature of the offence. 

An excellent First Aid web sites can be found at:

http://www.parasolemt.com.au/afa/
http://www.medicinenet.com/Script/Main/Art.asp?li=MNI&ArticleKey=224


See the Emergency Procedure for Ref.'s page for more advice.

 

Dopey's Bump Referee Cartoon by Julian Carosi


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS               Go back to the top of this page

 

Question 1a: What is a goalkeeper supposed to do if while catching the ball, he gets an injury? Is he supposed to try and throw the ball out for a corner or keep hold of it and give the opposing team an indirect free kick for holding onto the the ball too long? Or is there something in the small print of the rules which allows the Referee to deal with this scenario?

Answer 1a: A game should not proceed without a goalkeeper. If a goalkeeper gets injured and a goal is immediately following the injury, most Referees will allow the goal to count (as long as no foul had been committed on the goalkeeper). But if a goalkeeper gets injured and play carries on for a moment or two, then most Referees will stop play to allow the goalkeeper to be treated. Referees will need to use their judgement in deciding whether to stop play or not, and it is generally accepted by the players, that goalkeepers should be treated as soon as possible.

Although there is nothing in the Laws to cover this specific scenario, Referees will always accord goalkeepers with special protection.

The reason for this, is that Law 3 'Number of Players' states that:

"On field of play: Before kick-off, check that there are 11 players per side including a goalkeeper".

In other words, a game should not proceed without a goalkeeper.

The situation where the goalkeeper goes down injured whilst still possessing the ball, is no different to when an outfield player goes down injured with the ball trapped beneath him. And in these cases, the Referee should stop play immediately, before any opponents decide that the ball is still in play, and start kicking at the prostrate player.

Law 5 also states that the Referee can stop play if he suspects that a player is seriously injured.

The Referee usually allows the goalkeeper a moment or two to see whether he is able to throw the ball out of play himself. If this is not he case, then the Referee will (or should) always stop the game to allow treatment to be administered. Referees must err on the side of caution when judging whether an injury is serious or not. The game should not be allowed to continue without the goalkeeper.

If the Referee needs to stop the game, then the correct restart is a dropped ball. A dropped ball does not have to have two players, it can have none!. So in theses cases, all the Referee needs to do to restart play, is to drop the ball back to the goalkeeper (when no other players are nearby). If the injured goalkeeper managed to throw the ball out of play before the game was stopped - the correct restart is the natural restart, i.e. corner or throw-in. In these cases, opposing players usually follow 'the spirit of the game' and return the ball directly back to the goalkeeper's team.

An indirect free kick cannot be awarded in these situations, because they do not directly involve a foul committed by an opponent. The restart is either a dropped ball, or the neutral restart i.e. corner or throw-in.

Law 8: "A dropped ball is a way of restarting the match after a temporary stoppage that becomes necessary, while the ball is in play - for any reason not mentioned elsewhere in the Laws of the Game."

Thanks to Glynn for this interesting question.

 

Question 1b: A player kicks the ball towards the opposition's goal. The goalkeeper plunges, hurts his head on a goal post and remains on the ground; the ball returns from the post to the attacker. He kicks the ball into the free goal. How shall the referee decide?

Answer 1b:  A game should not proceed without a goalkeeper. If a goalkeeper gets injured and a goal is immediately scored following the injury, most Referees will allow the goal to count (as long as no foul had been committed on the goalkeeper). But if a goalkeeper gets injured and play carries on for a moment or two, then most Referees will stop play to allow the goalkeeper to be treated. Referees will need to use their judgement in deciding whether to stop play or not, and it is generally accepted by the players, that goalkeepers should be treated as soon as possible.
Although there is nothing in the Laws to cover this specific scenario, Referees will always accord goalkeepers with special protection. The reason for this, is that Law 3 'Number of Players' states that:
"On field of play: Before kick-off, check that there are 11 players per side including a goalkeeper".
In other words, a game should not proceed without a goalkeeper.
There are no answers in Law to this questions. The Referee will need to use his initiative to make a decision based on how long there is between the injury occurring to the goalkeeper, and the ball entering the goal. 
As a rule of thumb, I would personally use the following criteria if the period between the injury occurring and a potential attempt to score a goal was 2 or 3 seconds only:

I would imagine in my mind that the goalkeeper was (hypothetically) NOT injured:

(a) If it were physically possible for an uninjured goalkeeper to stop the goal being scored; then I would stop play.

(b) If it was physically impossible for an uninjured goalkeeper to stop the goal being scored; then the goal should be allowed. (WebMaster)

 

Question 2: Are players allowed to wear spectacles?

Answer 2: Sympathy has been expressed for players, especially young players, who need to wear spectacles. It is accepted that new technology had made sports spectacles much safer, both for the player himself and for other players.

While the Referee has the final decision on the safety of players’ equipment, the FA Board expects that Referees will take full account of modern technology and the improved safety features of spectacle design when making their decision.

 

Go back to the top of this page

Question 3: Does a Referee have any jurisdiction in deciding whether an ill or injured player can carry on playing on the field of play or not? For example, how does he deal with a player under the influence of drugs or drink?

Answer 3: With issues of safety, Referees shouldn't assume players to be "innocent until proven guilty", but rather be erring on the side of caution. It's up to the Referee to ensure that the situation is safe by being proactive, rather than being reactive and waiting until there are conclusive reasons to believe otherwise. Of course, Referees should not be breath-testing players before the game. But if something comes up to raise a doubt in the Referee's mind, then it's up to the Referee to eliminate that doubt before proceeding as a matter of basic caution. The fact that someone has been drinking, raises the very real possibility that their ability to play the game safely is impaired. Just because they don't seem drunk, doesn't mean that everything's okay.

Although in general, Referees are not medically qualified to make a judgement on why a player is behaving as if he were drunk (or to assess the extent of an injury), there will be times when common sense dictates that the Referee will have to make a sensible decision to protect the player from himself, and from causing potential injury (or contamination) to other players. There are many symptoms that could lead to a player behaving strangely. He may be on medication, or he may be genuinely ill or not be ill at all. He may have behavioural difficulties. He may have taken drugs or yes! - he may be under the influence of alcohol - but by how much? Smelling alcohol on someone's breath is an invitation for a reasonable suspicion that they've probably consumed it. Certainly there are other possible explanations, but consumption is the most likely.

Another consideration to think about, is if a seriously injured (or drunk) player is asked to leave the field of play by the Referee, and that player further damages himself whilst making his way of the field of play, this could lead to serious accusations being made against the Referee for ordering the player to leave the field before being medically assessed by a qualified person.

But we live in a world frightened of litigation. My advice is as follows:

Referees should always exercise extreme care in their choice of words to describe players who may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs, especially in connection with drug influence. In such circumstances, the matter should in the first instance be considered as a team responsibility and suitable attention be drawn to a club official, perhaps suggesting that a player looks too ill to continue/participate or seems to have a problem. Give the captain, coach/manger or a responsible medical person the chance to make this decision, and consult them by suggesting that the player seems to have a problem, and ask THEM to take some appropriate action. It should be pointed out to the team officials that the behaviour of the player might be dangerous to other players or to himself. 

A Referee is given licence to use his common sense, and if a Referee believes that a player may be under the influence of alcohol, there is a huge chance that the Referee will be correct in his assessment of that player. Of course, there is a remote chance that the Referee may be wrong, but that is very doubtful, as a drunk person is usually easy to spot.

It's like giving permission for a player to wear a plaster cast or glasses; it is not a black and white decision. Therefore, if a Referee smells alcohol on a player breath and the player is behaving as if he were drunk, and the team officials take no action, then the Referee should simply not allow him to play. 

Other Referees may wish to allow this player to participate in the game, but that's their prerogative. But my advice (failing sensible action being taken by the player's team) is for Referees to do what they think needs doing, and not worry about getting one decision wrong in maybe 100. 

Alcohol is a suppressant and also a drink which dehydrates people...particularly players of football matches. If a Referee decides that safety is compromised, the Referee should make sure to put this in a report and outline it specifically to the appropriate authority.

 

Question 4: Are some of the substances used for marking out the lines more dangerous than others?

Answer 4: Yes. Some substances are more dangerous than others. Various practices have been used in the past for the application of white lines to football pitches. The objectives of such practices has been to both reduce labour and materials costs whilst endeavouring to keep the lines visible for a greater length of time. Some of these practices have led to injury and subsequent court action being taken against managers and clubs. See The Lancashire Youth Football web site for an excellent page of information about Line Marking Safety covering materials  used in constructing the lines on the field of play. Visit their Articles page and look for the "Line Marking Safety" article.


The Lancashire Youth Football home page can be found here.

 

Question 5: When can players and Referees drink fluids during a game?

Answer 5: Because the balance of water in the body is essential for the health, drinking liquids during a game is not only permitted by FIFA but actively encouraged. The following rules must however be observed so as to avoid disorderliness on the field and prevent injury from missiles being thrown through the air.

(a) Liquids may only be drunk during stoppages in play.
(b) Drinks must be contained in plastic bottles and handed to the players on the sidelines.
(c) It is forbidden to throw bottles or other receptacles onto the field of play.
(d) The goalkeeper may keep a plastic bottle in the corner of his goal.
(e) Plastic bottles may be placed around the field of play approximately 1 metre away from the sidelines and goal-lines but only as long as they do not obstruct the Assistant Referees in the course of their duty.

Thank you for taking note of the above
Source:
J S Blatter
FIFA General Secretary
Taken from FIFA Circular 619 (1997)

If an infraction occurs that involves a player who is drinking whilst on the field of play, the Referee should punish the infraction in accordance with the type of offence that occurred. If the infraction involves the drink or its container, the Referee should view the drink or its container as being illegal use of an object on the field of play.

 If no infraction occurs, the Referee should use common sense and inform the player that to avoid disorderliness, liquids should only be drunk during stoppages in play. A caution would be extreme in such cases.

 

Question 6: Why is it that some Referees insist that a player who has been treated on the field of play leave the field of play after being treated, whilst other Referees are content for the player to remain on the field as play restarts?

Answer 6: Referees deal with injuries by using by common sense within the ‘spirit of the game’ – each incident is different.

1998/1999 Law 5 Amendment: An injured player returning into the field of play can enter from any boundary if the ball is out of play. And on the Referee’s signal. If the ball is still in play, the returning player can only enter from a touchline, and on the Referee’s signal.

2002/2003 Law 5 Amendment: The Referee stops the match if, in his opinion, a player Is seriously injured and ensures that he is removed from the field of play. An injured player may only return to the field of play after the match has restarted.
Reason: - This clarifies the procedure to be followed when a player returns to the field of play following injury.

The goalkeeper is different, because the Law requires a goalkeeper to be present on the field of play for each team, and that is why the goalkeeper is usually treated on the field of play. If the Referee stops play, he can restart it by just dropping the ball to the goalkeeper (a dropped-ball can take place with only one player in situ). But normally, a member of the opposition will offer (in the spirit of the game) to touch the dropped ball back to the goalkeeper. Treating the goalkeeper on the field of play also saves time, because if the goalkeeper had to be treated off the field of play, a colleague would have to take his place in goal. They would then have to swap again when the goalkeeper had received his treatment and was ready to return. It is therefore usually quicker to treat the goalkeeper on the field of play. It is also permissible for any other player, injured at the same time as the goalkeeper, to be treated on the field of play and neither player needs to leave after treatment unless required to do so by the Rules of some Competitions.

If a player is bleeding, he must leave the field immediately to have the bleeding stopped and his skin and uniform cleaned as thoroughly as possible. An injured player may only return to the field of play after the match has restarted.

FIFA instruction 549 dated 2nd December 1994 was the initial instruction advising that players must leave the field of play for treatment. An abridged version reads:

"When play is stopped the referee will enquire of a player if he needs treatment.

If the player does require treatment - can he walk to the touchline unaided? If yes, the player leaves the field of play and then play in restarted. If no, the Referee signals for physiotherapist, with a one arm wave.

The physiotherapist will be given time for his diagnosis/verification of the injury but must be reminded that no treatment is allowed on the field of play.

After diagnosis/verification, the player and the physiotherapist will walk off the field of play for treatment to be administered. The player will only return after a signal from the Referee, and after the match has restarted.

If the physiotherapist considers that the player cannot walk off the pitch, he will advise the Referee who will use the two-handed signal for a stretcher.

Players who refuse to leave the field of play must be cautioned for unsporting behaviour.

Two exceptions to the procedure will apply: (a) a head injury sustained by any player and (b) an injury sustained by a goalkeeper.

With the permission of the referee, a physiotherapist is allowed to attend an injured player on the field of play, during the time that the referee is administering disciplinary action against an offending player".

 

Question 7:  Prior to the game while checking the teams uniforms and shoes,
can you provide advice or any instructions of how to address the team/coach during youth games.

Answer 7: The Competition Rules should dictate whether or not the players equipment needs checking prior to the start of a game. As a general rule for Youth team games and lower-level games, players’ equipment is not necessarily inspected by the Referee prior to commencement of the game. A visual check as the Referee enters the field of play usually suffices. Nevertheless, if the Referee is suspicious about the safety of a player’s equipment, he can inspect at anytime (including before the game starts). If the Referee needs to advise the youth team coach before the game, something along the lines of the following would suffice:

"Please can you ensure that no jewellery of any sort is worn, unless suitably bandaged. All players must wear shin-pads, and I would be grateful if you could take a quick look at your players’ studs".

The Referee is within his rights to inspect all of the players’ equipment prior to a game, but this is not always done, and neither is it necessary (or expected) at the lower levels. The Referee is ultimately responsible for the safety of the players. Therefore it is his individual choice on how far he needs to go when inspecting equipment.

 

Question 8: Can you explain why players must have their shin-pads covered completely by their socks? In my daughter's team, they all prefer (for some unexplained reason) to wear the socks half-down, or they don't have tie-ups to keep them up. When I asked for the players of both teams to cover shin-pads up, I was accused (by my daughter after the game) of being pedantic! Is it a hang-on from when shin-pads were loose and liable to fall out if the socks were not fully covering them?  Maybe that's why she accused me of being pedantic!

Answer 8: (From the webmaster)  I've got a lump on my shin the size of an egg - a legacy of a hard challenge between me and a goalkeeper nearly 30 years ago! And I was wearing shin-pads. The socks help to keep the shin-pads in place during a hefty challenge, and they also serve to cushion against those little knobs that are on some shin-pads (there to grip the sock better). The socks also form a pad against the shin-pad material of which some plastic versions are rather hard. Although some players seem to think that ‘half-mast’ socks may look ‘trendy’ or ‘macho’, they do nothing to provide maximum protection to their shins (and other players). And as such, the Referee also has a duty in protecting the players from themselves!

I have 3 girls myself, and I know that such advice will probably "go in one ear and out the next" – but in my case I just flash my ‘lump’ and they run away in disgust! Yuck!!!!!!!!

Better to be pedantic than to regret any damage because you wanted to be ‘in with the girls!’.

If a player received a nasty injury because of the exposure of an opponent’s shin pad, you could be on ‘dodgy’ ground.

 

Question 9: Are goalkeepers allowed to dive at the feet of oncoming attacking players?. Surely, if there is a collision it is up to the goalkeeper as to what he does.  I wouldn't penalise an attacking player if he attempted a diving header.

Answer 9: Although goalkeepers must be especially protected by Referees, an attacking player is allowed to challenge for the ball and may attempt to play the ball as long as it is not in possession of the goalkeeper - providing that (in the opinion of the Referee) the challenge on the goalkeeper (or by the goalkeeper on the oncoming attacker) is not dangerous (reckless, careless or using excessive force) - then it should be OK.

If a goalkeeper wants to dive recklessly at the feet of an attacking player, then he should take the consequences if he gets injured. He should also be penalised if the dive ‘fouls’ the oncoming-attacking player.

It is virtually impossible for a Referee to protect a goalkeeper against acts that the goalkeeper does himself. It would be impossible to do so. Nevertheless, after the first occasion that a ‘mad’ goalkeeper dives at the feet on an attacking player, an astute Referee should have a ‘quiet word’ with the goalkeeper, and offer him some advice.

One last thought - always err on the side of safety - football comes second when it comes to the well-being of players (including mad goalkeepers).

 

Question 10: A long ball is kicked over the defence. An attacking player runs after the ball. The defending team’s goalkeeper reaches the ball first, and gives it a big kick. The attacker, who by this time is in close proximity, is hit full in the face by the ball and falls bleeding to the ground in some discomfort.   Meanwhile, the ball ricochets off the attacker, over the goalkeeper, and drops into the net. GOAL!
It is apparent that the unfortunate attacker has broken his nose as blood is leaking onto the grass.
Should the Referee allow the goal?
Or should he have stopped play immediately for the head injury?

Answer 10: Following a head injury, the Referee will normally very quickly anticipate where the ball is travelling and make a judgement as to whether he should stop play immediately or allow the ball to naturally make its own way out of play if the distance-delay is not great. It is difficult to give an answer to this question without actually being there. But it sounds as though there was only a very small time delay before the ball entered the goal, and therefore out of play.  In such cases the Referee may allow play to continue, but only if the delay is very short (and the head injury is not immediately life threatening).

Of course, if you take the question to its extreme, and the incident happened near the half-way line, then because of the greater distance that he ball has to travel, the chances are that an astute Referee would stop play immediately.

After all, it is only game, and it only takes a few seconds to die!

 

Question 11: I recently watched a youth game that was decided by a controversial goal.
The events leading to the goal were as follows: the left ‘winger’ ran down his wing in possession on the ball, cut into the box was confronted by the goalkeeper who saved the shot. The left ‘winger’ fell over the goalkeeper and claimed a penalty. The Referee waved play-on. The left ‘winger’ then feigned injury by rolling around the floor just inside the 18 yard box (penalty area). The goalkeeper cleared the ball up field into the opposition half. The ball was then cleared on the volley (back into the half from which it came) by a defender to his colleague on the right wing. The right winger (from an onside position) raced onto the ball. The left winger was still prostrate on the floor inside the penalty area. The right winger raced into the penalty area and was ‘closed down’ by the goalkeeper. He then passed the ball across the penalty area to the left winger who miraculously recovered from injury to tap the ball into an empty net.
I know that to the letter of the law the goal was legal, but the actions of the left winger left a "bad taste in the mouth". Should any action have been taken against the left winger?

Answer 11: Thank you for your question Dave.

Like you, I dislike the playacting antics of the modern player. In my time, if a team-mate made a fool of himself by such acts, we would have castigated him for not committing himself to the cause of the ‘team’ by not ‘getting on with it’ and getting back to defend.

As far as Law interpretation is concerned, I believe that this is looked as at being a ‘second phase’ in the play action – and as such, there is nothing in the Laws to say that this player is breaching the offside criteria (so long as the left winger was not nearer to both the ball and the second last defender when the ball was passed to him by his colleague the right winger.). The goal cannot therefore be disallowed.

Nevertheless, advice being received over the past few years encourages Referees to discipline players who feign injury. It is very difficult for a Referee to be certain that an injury is being feigned, and Referees tend to give players the benefit of the doubt. But there is nothing to stop the Referee in this scenario from awarding a yellow card to the left winger for his ‘cheating’ actions. (WebMaster)

 

Question 12: Can a Referee by held responsible for an injury occurring to a player?

Answer 12: There was a case in 2002 concerning a rugby front-row player Richard Vowles, 29, from Llanharan, south Wales, who broke his back in a match playing for the village side in January 1998. In the High Court in London, the Wales Rugby Union (WRU) admitted responsibility for the match Referee's failure to opt for uncontested scrums, which caused the collapse while Mr Vowles was playing hooker in the scrum.

See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_union/2573291.stm

It is only a matter of time before a similar case hits the streets in the World of Football.

Thousands of players are badly injured every year by dangerous foul play or unsafe playing conditions. Careers are ruined and thousands of pounds lost in wages, yet very few football players claim compensation.  When players play football, they accept the risks of things like an accidental clash of heads. But they don't accept the risks that someone might throw a punch or kick them when the ball isn't there or that a tackle on them is made with the sole intention of committing bodily harm or that the facilities being used are unsafe.

As far as the Laws of Associated Football are concerned.

Decision 1 of (Laws of Associated Football Law 5 states that:

"A referee (or where applicable, an assistant referee or fourth official) is not held liable for:

Whether this holds any sway in Court, is for the Court to decide.

The advice from the FA, is that there is no specific advice for Referees where a player seeks to take legal action against another player. The Referee will not be involved unless the law requires him to attend any Court Proceedings. If this is the case The County Football Association, The Football Association or the Referees Association may offer advice. This is always done on a case by case basis.

Your question: "Would the Referee be liable for legal action?"

Is one that only a Court of Law can provide. Most Referees put players’ safety at the top of their agenda in every game. In fact they sometimes go too far the other way to prevent injuries.

 

Question 13: During a league match, immediately after the kick off a team captain complains to the referee that an opponent is drunk. What action should the referee take?


Answer 13:  Referees should always exercise extreme care in their choice of words to describe players who may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs, especially in connection with drug influence. In such circumstances, the matter should be considered as a team responsibility and suitable attention be drawn to a club official, perhaps suggesting that a player was too ill to continue/participate or seemed to have a problem.
(Source Referees Association)

 

Question 14: In a game that I was Refereeing, a young player approached me with blood gushing from an open wound on his finger (no idea how it happened). A senior qualified Referee who was watching my game the player that he could not return until he had a clean shirt on. The player had dripped blood onto his shirt. I disagreed, made sure the wound was adequately dealt with and allowed him back into the game - even with his slightly blood stained shirt-- (hardly a Dave Watson, or Stuart Pearce design on the shirt). Was I wrong? It seemed a waste of discussion to me, but the other Referee, more experienced than me, was adamant.

Answer 14: Firstly, let's have a look at what the Law says.

"Law 5 Referees' Powers and Duties: …….ensures that any player bleeding from a wound leaves the field of play. The player may only return on receiving a signal from the referee, who must be satisfied that the bleeding has stopped".

You (the Referee) are the only person who can allow the player back onto the field, or not. The other Referee (although maybe more senior) can offer you some good advice, but the final decision is yours to make, and not his. So it is up to you to take his advice or not. You are the one who gets the blame if things go wrong, and not he. As a general rule, it is always wise to take the advice of a more experienced Referee in such situations. Of course, a player should not be allowed back if he has a blood saturated shirt. There is also no guideline, as to the amount of saturation that can be accepted - in fact, it only takes a minute spot of blood to produce contamination. If the player's clothes are bloodstained, they should be changed for clean ones once the wound has been treated. All contaminated clothing and equipment must be replaced prior to the player being allowed to resume play. If bleeding cannot be controlled and the wound securely covered, the player must not continue in the game. All clothing, equipment and surfaces contaminated by blood must be treated as potentially infectious.
The risk of being infected with a blood -born virus through participation in sport is very low, however infection is possible. Therefore, it would also be wise to remember also, that whilst a players blood is not dangerous to himself, it is 'potentially' fatal, should it contaminate with other players' blood. A number of blood-borne infectious diseases can be transmitted during body contact and collision sports. The more serious include VIRAL HEPATITIS and HIV (AID) infections.
It is every participant's responsibility to maintain strict blood and body fluid safety at all times. If a bleeding wound occurs the individual's participation must be interrupted until the bleeding has been stopped and the wound is both rinsed with plenty of water and if dirty, washed with soap and covered with a waterproof dressing.
If the bleeding player does not leave the field voluntarily or when asked, the Referee should suspend the game until he leaves, and caution the player.

 

Question 15: The Referee stops play for a foul. On closer inspection, the Referee notices that that the player who committed the foul is not wearing any shin guards. The Referee asks this player to leave the field of play to put on some shin pads. The victim of the foul is injured, and has to be treated outside of the field of play. Before play is restarted, the Referee is asked to ensure that the defensive wall is the correct distance away. Whilst the Referee is managing this, the two players who have left the field of play, ask to re-enter. What should the Referee do?

Answer 15: Law 4 states that; "any player required to leave the field of play to correct his equipment does not re-enter without the referee's permission. The referee checks that the player's equipment is correct before allowing him to re-enter the field of play. The player is only allowed to re-enter the field of play when the ball is out of play."

Therefore, as play is already stopped, the player who has now put a pair of shin guards on, can enter the field of play with the Referees permission.

Law 5 states; " An injured player may only return to the field of play after the match has restarted."

Therefore, as play has not restarted, the player who has now been treated for his injury, will have to wait for play to commence before he can enter the field of play with the Referees permission.

This is somewhat unfair considering that the injured player has to wait for play to restart before he can re-enter, yet the perpetrator of the foul is allowed by Law to come on immediately during this stoppage of play.

 

Question 16: You turn up to your game one Saturday afternoon and you have been told by the manager of the Blue Team that the Red team's Midfielder has A.I.D.S. What do you (the Referee) do?


Answer 16: The Referee should remind the Blue Team manager that revealing such confidential information in a non- professional setting may qualify as a breach of privacy and opens up the possibility of a civil suit.
Individuals with infectious diseases have the same right to confidentiality as any other person. It is the player's responsibility to maintain strict personal hygiene, as this is the best method of controlling the spread of infectious diseases.

FIFA are proactive in promoting HIV/AIDS information and prevention campaigns. Referees should treat every person on the field, as they would do in any area of society, with the assumption there is a possibility that any player may be HIV positive. The referee should prevent a player who is bleeding profusely from taking any further part in a match until he has been adequately treated and the bleeding has stopped. This is a straightforward duty for the Referee perform.

A Referees should serve to be a sports ambassadors for HIV prevention, the same as he is for all the other duties and responsibilities he is expected to uphold. If the Blue Team manager persists in his attentions to you, he should be told that you will be reporting his comments to the FA. The diagnosis or confirmation of such afflictions is far beyond the capabilities and responsibilities of a Referee.

 

Question 17. A player breaks his nose in a collision and becomes irritated by comments from the opposition bench as he leaves the field of play. With his nose bleeding like a waterfall he tries to confront the bench and throws a handful of his blood at the principle person making the remarks, who in turn becomes unhappy by this. What action should the Referee take ?


Answer 17 (From The Referees' Association England April 04). This should be considered the same as a striking offence, and the player banned from any further participation in the game. Also, the main culprit on the bench should be dealt with in accordance with law, depending on his actions and words.

 

Question 18: Should a trainer be allowed to put muddy water (from the 'bucket') onto a bleeding wound?

Answer 18: Although the Referee has no authority to stop such an action, he can certainly strongly advise for the muddy water NOT to put on the bleeding wound - and I have done so many times.

 

Question 19: Is there any advice about lightening?

Answer 19: Using the ‘30-30 ’ rule, the distance of the storm should be estimated before allowing play to continue. This rule is one of the most practical techniques for estimating the distance to lightning activity and is based on the fact that light travels faster than sound.

When lightning is sighted, count the time until thunder is heard. If that time is 30 seconds or less, the thunderstorm is within 10km and is dangerous. As most experts believe that the ‘safe ’ distance is no less than 10km,,all people at risk should be seeking, or already inside safe shelters. This is the time at which matches should be suspended.

Click here for a the comprehensive lightning policy advice from the NSW Soccer Federation:

Or here for the USSF advice.

 

Question 20: A player gets injured and leaves the field of play with the Referee's permission to receive treatment. The Referee tells him not to re-enter, until the Referee gives him a signal to do so. The injured player's team attack the opponents' goal, and the injured player slips onto the field unnoticed, and without receiving the Referee's permission, and scores a goal !
What action should the Referee take?

Answer 20: There are infinite scenarios that can (and do) occur in a game of football, and this is one of many that are not specifically mentioned in the Laws; and neither is there any guidance in the latest FIFA Questions & Answers.

Nevertheless…………………..…………..

When an injured player enters the field of play without the Referee's permission, it is considered that this constitutes an infringement by the team that the player belongs to. It would therefore be grossly unfair to award that team with a goal scored by one of its own players, who should not even be on the field of play! A goal scored under such circumstances, is against the 'Spirit of the Game', and should be expunged by the Referee (provided that play has not restarted following the scoring of the goal).

The Referee should disallow the goal, caution the perpetrator, and restart play with an indirect free kick, to be taken from where the offence occurred. The Law 12 Caution Offence in this case, occurs where the injured player "enters the field of play without the permission of the Referee".

 

Question 21: Who should be allowed on to the field of play to administer treatment for an injury (and how many of them)?

Answer 21: Of course, this very much depends at what level you are Refereeing at, and the type of injury sustained. But as a general rule, there is some guidance in the section of the Laws of Association Football (LOAF) chapter entitled "Additional Instructions for Referees, Assistant Referees and Fourth Officials", which stipulates the following:

after questioning the injured player, the referee authorises one, or at most two doctors, to enter the field to ascertain the type of injury and to arrange the player's safe and swift removal from the field.

Add to this the stretcher-bearers, and the number grows.
Of course, if it takes 10 doctors (or medics) to save a life, then all the rulings above go out of the window.
At the top games in England, each Home Club must have a Team Doctor, a Crowd Doctor and a physiotherapist available throughout the game, and for a reasonable time before, and after the game. No person other than the participating Club's Team Doctor and physiotherapist are permitted to treat players on the field of play.
As you get lower down the footballing levels, teams should have in attendance, the holder of an Emergency Aid Certificate approved by the FA.
Oh -and if the ambulance arrives, then of course, the paramedics and duty doctor may also make up the numbers.
If you are interested in reading more on this subject, then you an do so by visiting the FA web site here, and downloading  'The FA Handbook', where detailed medical information can be found in the Appendix to the handbook. 

 

Question 22: Should I allow players to play when wearing glasses? Is this a dangerous item that can crack and cause cuts or would I be "discriminating" by not allowing them to do so!


Answer 22: It is down to the Referee's discretion if a player can wear glasses as he or she has to decide if they pose a danger to the player or the other players. There are a number of special sport glasses that are available through all leading opticians, which are suitable for playing football in. 

Alternatively players should wear contact lenses. Wearing glasses does not come under Law 4 in FIFA Laws of the Game 'Players Equipment', this is why the decision comes down to the referees discretion.

The advice we are given from our FA (FAMOA Journal June 2004) here in England is as follows:

Football is a contact sport and as such is a moderate risk for eye injuries. Players in preference to contact lenses sometimes wear spectacles or goggles.

Polycarbonate lenses are the most important property of all protective spectacles or goggles. Polycarbonate is virtually unbreakable, and will sustain the impact of a ball or finger. An elasticised band and not just temple pieces should secure the frame. Players must have a means of securing the spectacles or goggles tightly to the head so that they will stay in place during play. A frame with temple support only will not hold tight enough, and a jab from a finger could lift the frame off, and make its way to the eye.

Although sports eyewear is intended to offer the best protection available, there is always the possibility that the wearer may sustain an eye or facial injury due to severe impact or because of the nature of the athletic activity,

Referees should ensure that if a request has been made to wear glasses or goggles, that they must not constitute a danger to himself or to any other player. We are anxious not to put obstacles in the way of players who wish to participate in the game but neither must we compromise safety.

End of Serious Injury Page

Go back to the top of this page